Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 WI 16 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

78 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 14071 (§ 170101 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc. · Graham v. Richardson · Frontiero v. Richardson · Chapman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Instead, the party challenging a statute's constitutionality must 'prove that the statute is unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “unless it is 'patently arbitrary' and bears no rational relationship to a legitimate government interest.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is designed to assure that those who are similarly situated will be treated similarly.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.