Pries v. McMillon’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holytz v. City of Milwaukee · 72 Wis. 2d 282 - Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System · 80 Wis. 2d 525 - Cords v. Anderson · 143 Wis. 2d 701 - C.L. v. Olson · Lodl v. Progressive Northern Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] public officer's duty is ministerial only when it is absolute, certain and imperative, involving merely the performance of a specific task when the law imposes, prescribes and defines the time, mode and occasion for its performance with such certainty that nothing remains for judgment or discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]f liability is premised upon the negligent performance (or non-performance) of a ministerial duty imposed by law or government policy”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he two exceptions overlap to an extent, inasmuch as they both require the identification of a ministerial duty.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.