State v. Artic’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

52 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “him by the deprivation of something like food or sleep; (3) whether the conditions attending the request to search were congenial, non-threatening, and cooperative, or the opposite; (4) how the defendant responded to the request to search; (5) what characteristics the defendant had as to age, intelligence, education, physical and emotional condition, and prior experience with the police; and (6) whether the police informed the defendant that he could refuse consent. Id., ¶33. 12 No. 2015AP1261-CR seizures.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. David W. Howes · State v. Navdeep S. Brar

2. “if it is not contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. David W. Howes · State v. Navdeep S. Brar

3. “To determine if the consent exception is satisfied, we review, first, whether consent was given in fact by words, gestures, or conduct; and, second whether the consent given was voluntary.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. David W. Howes · 383 Wis. 2d 192 - State v. Gerald P. Mitchell