Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 WIAPP 11 - State v. Forbush

State v. Forbush’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · McNeil v. Wisconsin · Michigan v. Jackson · Minnick v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the Miranda-Edwards-Minnick line of cases (which is not in doubt), a defendant who does not want to speak to the police without counsel present need only say as much when he is first approached and given the Miranda warnings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We conclude that Montejo effectively overrules Dagnall.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.