State v. Lesik’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wisconsin v. Laxton · Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund · 139 Wis. 2d 397 - Bachowski v. Salamone · 206 Wis. 2d 199 - State v. Coleman · 183 Wis. 2d 505 - State v. Thiel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'fully and fairly inform[ed] . .. of the rules of law applicable to the case and ... assist the jury in making a reasonable analysis of the evidence.' " Id. (citation omitted). ¶ 11. We agree with the trial court's assessment that the pattern instruction accurately states the law. Before the jury could find Gonzalez guilty, the trial court's jury instruction required the State to prove, among other things, that Gonzalez "exhibited or played harmful material to A[.]G[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gonzalez“We will reverse and order a new trial '[o]nly if the jury instructions, as a whole, misled the jury or communicated an incorrect statement of law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gonzalez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.