Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 WIAPP 37 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Harris v. New York · Kentucky v. Stincer · Walder v. United States · United States v. Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “right to be present at any stage of the criminal proceeding that is critical to its outcome if [the accused's] presence would contribute to the fairness of the procedure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “critical stage is any point in the criminal proceedings when a person may need counsel's assistance to assure a meaningful defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “right to be represented by counsel at all critical stages of the trial,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.