State v. Beauchamp’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Davis v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] statement made by a declarant while believing that the de-clarant's death was imminent, concerning the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be the declarant's impending death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owens“Belief of impending death 'may be made to appear from . . . the nature and extent of the wounds inflicted being obviously such that he must have felt or known that he could not survive.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Owens“Where testimonial statements are at issue, the only indicium of reliability sufficient to satisfy constitutional demands is the one the Constitution actually prescribes: confrontation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beauchamp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.