Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 WI App 57 - State v. Brimer

2010 WI App 57 - State v. Brimer’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Minnesota v. Murphy · Allen v. Illinois · State v. Allen · 81 Wis. 2d 376 - State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only issue on appeal [was] whether using Brimer's statement [on a standard DOC form containing the same immunity language as the form at issue in this case] at his reconfinement hearing violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “I have also been advised that none of this information can be used against me in criminal proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.