Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2010 WY 42 - Eres v. State

Eres v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Granzer v. State · Statezny v. State · Sotolongo-Garcia v. State · Grissom v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and do not identify the specific point in time that the value of property should be determined. Thus, as noted by the parties, the statute is susceptible to more than one meaning. This Court has not previously determined the meaning of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.