Sullivan v. Commerce Insurance’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Heacock v. Heacock · Nelson v. Salem State College · Cingoranelli v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. · Eck v. Godbout · Beals v. Commercial Union Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review of a grant of summary judgment is well known and oft-cited. See, e.g., Burns v. McDonald’s Corp., 2010 Mass. App. Div. 205, 208 . The question ‘is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party [...], all material facts have been established and the moving parly [...] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.’ City of Newburyport v. Woodman, 79 Mass. App. Ct. 84, 89 (2011), quoting Nelson v. Salem State College, 446 Mass. 525, 530 (2006). See also Consumer Prod. Distrib., Inc. v. Elseidy, 2010 Mass. App. Div. 269, 270 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.