Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 ME 92 - State v. Burns

State v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Neder v. United States · Washington v. Recuenco · State v. Hewey · State v. McKeough

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although a person charged with theft may have intended to repay or otherwise restore the stolen property, that person may 'nonetheless consciously use ... the money in a way which the jury could find made it unlikely that the [rightful owner] would recover it, in violation of section 352(3)(C).'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “use[s] or dispose[s] of the property under circumstances that make it unlikely that the owner will recover it or that manifest an indifference as to whether the owner will recover it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.