Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 MT 169 - Patrick v. State

Patrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. State · Finlen v. Heinze · Finlen v. Heinze · Swan v. State · Kulstad v. Maniaci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a civil action ... a motion for substitution by the party filing the action must be filed within 30 calendar days after the first summons is served or an adverse party has appeared. A motion for substitution by the party served must be filed within 30 calendar days after service has been completed in compliance with M. R. Civ. P. 4.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.