Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 MT 89 - State v. Finley

State v. Finley’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · United States v. DiFrancesco · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · Smith v. Massachusetts · State v. Gunderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the State is not precluded from appellate review when a district court, acting as an intermediate appellate court, sets aside a guilty verdict entered by a justice court of record. Should the State prevail, the tangible effect is reinstatement of the trier of fact’s guilty verdict. Such circumstances do not subject defendants to impermissible retrial, further prosecution or double punishment for the same offense. Moreover, such an appeal comports with this Court’s power and obligation to provide final appellate review of district court decisions when the district court has functioned as an intermediate appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.