Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2011 ND 110

Disciplinary Board v. Stensland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2011

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2011-06-21

Decided 2011-06-21

¶1Filed 6/21/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72011 ND 106

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15Ryan Douglas Zottnick, Defendant and Appellant

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20100111

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Ryan Douglas Zottnick, Petitioner and Appellant

¶24

¶25v.

¶26

¶27State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

¶28

¶29

¶30

¶31No. 20110069

¶32

¶33

¶34

¶35

¶36Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

¶37

¶38AFFIRMED.

¶39

¶40Per Curiam.

¶41

¶42Pamela Ann Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5518, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5518, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

¶43

¶44Susan Schmidt, 400 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 27, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

¶45State v. Zottnick

¶46Nos. 20100111 & 20110069

¶47

¶48Per Curiam.

¶49[¶1] Ryan Zottnick appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of simple assault-domestic violence (second offense or more) and from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief.  On appeal, Zottnick argues that there was insufficient evidence presented to convict him of the charge and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

¶50[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶51Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶52Mary Muehlen Maring

¶53Daniel J. Crothers

¶54Dale V. Sandstrom

/2011/nd/110 · .json · Public domain