State v. Deviley

¶1Filed 9/15/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72011 ND 179

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11Anthony James Moore, Petitioner and Appellant

¶12

¶13v.

¶14

¶15State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

¶16

¶17

¶18

¶19No. 20110052

¶20

¶21

¶22

¶23Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John Charles Irby, Judge.

¶24

¶25AFFIRMED.

¶26

¶27Per Curiam.

¶28

¶29Anthony James Moore (on brief), self-represented, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521, petitioner and appellant.

¶30

¶31Birch P. Burdick (on brief), State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.

¶32Moore v. State

¶33No. 20110052

¶34

¶35Per Curiam.

¶36[¶1] Anthony Moore appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief filed on December 30, 2010.  On appeal, Moore alleges North Dakota is in non-compliance with federal public law 109-248.  Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901-16991 (2006)).  Moore argues he is improperly categorized as a sex offender subject to a lifetime registration requirement, and he should be re-sentenced under federal public law 109-248 to a reduced registration requirement.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶38Mary Muehlen Maring

¶39Daniel J. Crothers

¶40Dale V. Sandstrom

¶41Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶42