State v. Aguilar

¶1Filed 12/13/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT

¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

¶4

¶5

¶6

¶72011 ND 220

¶8

¶9

¶10

¶11

¶12In the Interest of J.G., a child, D.M., a child

¶13

¶14Lisa Stremick, L.S.W., Petitioner and Appellee

¶15

¶16v.

¶17

¶18J.G., a child; D.M., a child;

¶19and K.M., Mother; K.G., Father, Respondents

¶20

¶21K.M., Mother, Appellant

¶22

¶23

¶24

¶25No. 20110046

¶26

¶27

¶28

¶29Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.

¶30

¶31AFFIRMED.

¶32

¶33Per Curiam.

¶34

¶35Pam H. Ormand, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 3106, Fargo, ND 58108-3106, for petitioner and appellee.

¶36

¶37Douglas W. Nesheim, 15 9th St. S., Fargo, ND 58108-1830, for respondent and appellant.

¶38Interest of J.G. & D.M.

¶39No. 20110046

¶40

¶41Per Curiam.

¶42[¶1] K.M., the mother, appealed from a district court order affirming a juvenile court’s finding of deprivation and continuing placement of J.G. and D.M. with Cass County Social Services for six months.  On appeal, K.M. argues the evidence presented did not support a finding of deprivation by clear and convincing evidence.  She also argues the juvenile court erred because the evidence presented did not support a finding that the extension of custody was necessary to accomplish the purposes of the prior custody order.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

¶43[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

¶44Carol Ronning Kapsner

¶45Mary Muehlen Maring

¶46Daniel J. Crothers

¶47Dale V. Sandstrom