¶1Filed 2/8/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶11Randy Raymond Binstock, Plaintiff and Appellant
¶13v.
¶15North Dakota Department of Transportation, Defendant and Appellee
¶19No. 20100287
¶23Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
¶25AFFIRMED.
¶27Per Curiam.
¶29Danny L. Herbel, The Regency Business Center, 3333 E. Broadway Ave., Ste. 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellant.
¶31Douglas B. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 N. 9th St., Bismarck, ND 58501-4509, for defendant and appellee.
¶32Binstock v. N.D. Dep’t of Transportation
¶33No. 20100287
¶35Per Curiam.
¶36[¶1] Randy Raymond Binstock appealed the district court’s judgment affirming the Department of Transportation’s revocation of his driver’s license. Binstock argues he was not informed that he was being arrested for driving under the influence. Consequently, he argues the deputy sheriff’s request for a blood test was ineffective and therefore his refusal to submit to a blood test is not a “refusal” for purposes of revoking his license under N.D.C.C. ch. 19-20. We affirm the district court’s judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).
¶37[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶38Carol Ronning Kapsner
¶39Mary Muehlen Maring
¶40Daniel J. Crothers
¶41Dale V. Sandstrom