State v. Randy J.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
October 2023
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Muniz · State Ex Rel. Helman v. Gallegos · State v. Davis · State v. Gallegos · State v. JAVIER M.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing an order of suppression, we defer to the district court's findings of fact that are supported by substantial evidence, and we review the district court's application of the law to the facts de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under the Fifth Amendment, the privilege against self-incrimination only protects the accused from being compelled to provide the state with evidence of a testimonial or communicative nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Romero“lack of muscular coordination during the [FSTs] is not a statement subject to suppression under Section 32A-2-14(D).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. CANDACE S.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.