State ex rel. Womack v. Marsh’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
137
cited by 137 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited
137 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Foster · State v. Baker · State ex rel. Cruzado v. Zaleski · State v. Singleton · 115 Ohio St. 3d 195 - State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntosh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]lerical mistakes in judgments, orders, or other parts of the record, and errors in the record arising from oversight or omission, may be corrected by the court at any time.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wilson · State v. Goodwin“'A court can dismiss a mandamus action under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted if, after all factual allegations of the complaint are presumed true and all reasonable inferences are made in the relator's favor, it appears beyond doubt that he can prove no set of facts entitling him to the requested writ of mandamus.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.