State v. Ratliff’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Warner · 140 Ohio App. 3d 326 - State v. Martin · 34 Ohio App. 3d 33 - State v. Williams · State v. Boles · 65 Ohio App. 3d 117 - State v. Clifton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the court imposes restitution, the court may base the amount of restitution it orders on an amount recommended by the victim, the offender, a presentence investigation report, estimates or receipts indicating the cost of repairing or replacing property, and other information, provided that the amount the court orders as restitution shall not exceed the amount of the economic loss suffered by the victim as a direct and proximate result of the commission of the offense. If the court decides to impose restitution, the court shall hold a hearing on restitution if the offender, victim, or survivor disputes the amount.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lalain“Whether, despite the defendant’s failure to object, it is error for the trial court to order a defendant to pay an amount of restitution in the absence of a specific plea agreement and without a hearing or evidence substantiating the economic loss claimed by the plaintiff?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lalain
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.