Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 Ohio 3373 - State v. Telshaw

State v. Telshaw’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Cortez · United States v. Matlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution secure an individual's right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “intrude on a person's privacy to carry out community caretaking functions to enhance public safety.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.