Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 Ohio 3864 - State v. Leopard

State v. Leopard’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

246
cited by 246 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

246 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Foster · State v. Kalish · State v. Mathis · AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp. · Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 246 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to protect the public from future crime by the offender and others and to punish the offender using the minimum sanctions that the court determines accomplish those purposes without imposing an unnecessary burden on state or local government resources.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “consider the need for incapacitating the offender, deterring the offender and others from future crime, rehabilitating the offender, and making restitution to the victim of the offense, the public, or both.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.