Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 Ohio 3937 - State v. Tyler

State v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

44 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thompkins · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass · State v. Adams · State v. Issa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, Evid.R. 901(B)(5) provides for authentication by voice identification 'whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording.' Second, under Evid.R. 901(B)(9), a sound recording may be authenticated through evidence that demonstrates a process or system used that produces an 'accurate result.' " Tyler at 450 . {¶35} Here, Mahoning County Sheriff's Deputy Joseph Duarte, who is -8- employed with the technical services unit at the department, testified that as part of his job responsibilities he is familiar with the recording of phone calls that occur at the jail. Duarte explained that the phone calls are "recorded digitally on hard disk on a server that resides inside the secure IT room.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.