Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 OHIO 5827 - State v. Warmus

State v. Warmus’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

46 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · State v. Bradley · Washington v. Texas · Smith v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accordingly, the court has 'wide latitude insofar as the Confrontation Clause is concerned to impose reasonable limits on such cross-examination based on concerns about, among other things, harassment, prejudice, confusion of the issues, the witness' safety, or interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.