Burchett v. Larkin’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. · 110 Ohio App. 3d 46 - Wiltberger v. Davis · Franklin County Sheriff's Department v. State Employment Relations Board · 81 Ohio App. 3d 286 - Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc. · 149 Ohio App. 3d 390 - Riston v. Butler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen * * * reasonable inquiry by a party's counsel of record should reveal the inadequacy of a claim, a finding that the counsel of record has engaged in frivolous conduct is justified, as is an award, made within the statutory guidelines, to any party adversely affected by the frivolous conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Murray v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.