Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2011 Ohio 738

State v. Helms

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2011

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2011-02-22

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2016

4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant's first assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153 , 2010-Ohio-6314 , 942 N.E.2d 1061 , and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Helms

Relies on State v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-02-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

¶2 {¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is not accepted.

¶3 {¶ 3} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s first assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., concurs but would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Cupp, J., dissents and would not accept the appeal.
/2011/ohio/738 · .json · Public domain