Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 OK 31 - Hyde v. Cotton

Hyde v. Cotton’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pettis v. Johnston · 108 Wash. 2d 299 - McDaniels v. Carlson · Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital Authority · Nealis v. Baird · Wilson v. Kane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of privity depends upon the cireumstances and requires 'a person so identified in interest with another that he represents the same legal right'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “actually have the same interest, character, or capacity as the party against whom the prior judgment was rendered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.