Underwood v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Franks v. Delaware · Edwards v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether a suspect's statements to police are voluntary in the legal sense depends on an evaluation of all the surrounding circumstances, including the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Once a suspect in custody has asserted his right to speak only through counsel, all attempts at interrogation must cease. A suspect can, however, change his mind and decide to speak to police without counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SPRUILL v. STATE · Spruill v. State“[It is a highly subjective and largely moral judgment about the punishment that a particular person deserves.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. POSEY v. STATE · Malone v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.