Grimes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Marutzky v. State · Degraffenreid v. State · 2001 OK CR 29 - Byrd v. Caswell · 2002 OK CR 6 - Burnham v. State · Hemphill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]bsent a determination by the District Court, this Court will not assume jurisdiction of an extraordinary writ, especially in a revocation appeal where our review is limited to whether or not the District Court abused its discretion in revoking all or part of a defendant's suspended sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. SEARS v. STATE“is obligated to abide by the terms and conditions of his probation or face revocation of the unexecuted portion of his sentence. The unexecuted portion of the sentence consists of any time during that . . . [time] span not spent in custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. TRYON v. STATE“a defendant cannot acquiesce in the delay of a hearing and/or participate in the continuance of a hearing and then claim that he is entitled to relief because the court did not abide by the 20-day time limitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. SEARS v. STATE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.