Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 OKCR 21 - Coddington v. State

Coddington v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jones v. Barnes · Harrington v. Richter · McNeill v. United States · Bobby v. Van Hook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that counsel's representation was unreasonable under prevailing professional norms and that the challenged action could not be considered sound trial strategy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “likely to have support in law and fact to be relevant to an allegation raised in the application for post-conviction relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.