2011 Pa. Super. 141 - Commonwealth v. Fink’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Cronic · Commonwealth v. Pierce · Commonwealth v. Lantzy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only those omissions of counsel on appeal that completely foreclose appellate review offer a basis for a presumption of prejudice on a [subsequent ineffective assistance of counsel] claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lukens v. Franco“[c]ounsel's constitutional error ... caused a total failure in the relevant proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lukens v. Franco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.