Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 Pa. Super. 147 - Commonwealth v. Barnett

2011 Pa. Super. 147 - Commonwealth v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Hubbard · Commonwealth v. Grant · Commonwealth v. Bomar · Van Allen v. Nicholson · Commonwealth v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prolix collateral claims should not be reviewed on post-verdict motions unless the defendant waives his right to PCRA review. ..see also Commonwealth v. Liston, 602 Pa. 10 , 977 A.2d 1089, 1095-1101 (Castille, C.J., concurring, joined by Saylor, J., & Eakin, J.). Holmes, 606 Pa. at 209 , 996 A.2d at 479 . See also, Commonwealth v. Jette, 23 A.3d 1032 , 1033 fn. 2 (Pa.2011). Here, we note that Blye has specifically indicated that he does not wish to”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Based on the opinion of a majority of participating justices in [Commonwealth v.] Wright [ 599 Pa. 270 , 961 A.2d 119 (2008) ] and Liston, this Court cannot engage in review of ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal absent an “express, knowing and voluntary waiver of PCRA review.” Liston, 602 Pa. at 22, 977 A.2d at 1096 (Castille, C.J., concurring). With the proviso that a defendant may waive further PCRA review in the trial court, 16 absent further instruction from our Supreme Court, this Court, pursuant to Wright and Liston, will no longer consider ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.