2011 Pa. Super. 159 - Strauss v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 2020
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2006 Pa. Super. 175 - Smith v. Smith · 2003 Pa. Super. 171 - In Re Estate of Luongo · Busse v. Busse · Haak's Estate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If an order of [alimony pendente lite ] is bolstered by competent evidence, the order will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cook, R. v. Cook, D.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.