Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 Pa. Super. 227 - Commonwealth v. Corley

2011 Pa. Super. 227 - Commonwealth v. Corley’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Grant · Commonwealth v. Bomar · Commonwealth v. Devers · Commonwealth v. Walls · Commonwealth v. Reaves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ounsel's failure to file post-sentence motions [does] not fall within the narrow ambit of ineffectiveness claims requiring no finding of prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the post-sentence and direct appeal period”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.