2011 Pa. Super. 258 - Cogley v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2003 Pa. Super. 310 - John B. Conomos, Inc. v. Sun Co., Inc. · Graham v. Today's Spirit · Srednick v. Sylak · Kappe Associates, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · 2008 Pa. Super. 217 - Joseph v. Scranton Times L.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only a court may determine whether a party has filed a complaint by interpreting and applying the relevant Pennsylvania rules of civil procedure, statutes, and other legal authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]ecause 'file' has a legal meaning, [Cogley's] 'admissions' that he 'filed' the complaint on June 3, 2009, are not binding admissions of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.