2011 Pa. Super. 31 - Knowles v. LEVAN’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2025
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2002 Pa. Super. 251 - Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Medical Associates, P.C. · Rettger v. UPMC SHADYSIDE · 2010 Pa. Super. 176 - Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc. · Paves v. Corson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[I]t is well settled that the admissibility of evidence is a determination left to the sound discretion of the trial court, and it will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion or misapplication of law.” Knowles v. Levan, 15 A.3d 504, 507 (Pa.Super.2011) (quoting Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 7 A.3d 830, 839 (Pa.Super.2010)). For a ruling on the admissibility of evidence to constitute reversible error, it must have, been harmful or prejudicial to the complaining party. Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.