2011 Pa. Super. 65 - Commonwealth v. Andre’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Clark v. Arizona · Commonwealth v. James · 374 Pa. Super. 549 - Commonwealth v. Trill · 2006 Pa. Super. 170 - Commonwealth v. Preston · 186 Ill. 2d 243 - People v. Lantz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]t the time of the commission of the offense, the actor was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing or, if the actor did know the quality of the act, that he did not know that what he was doing was wrong.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In a criminal case, under the circumstances provided by law, the Commonwealth may take an appeal as of right from an order that does not end the entire case where the Commonwealth certifies in the notice of appeal that the order will terminate or substantially handicap the prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Com. v. Landis“override the element of mens rea " because an individual may have the necessary mens rea when he "knows what he ... is doing, but does not know that it is wrong”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.