Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 Pa. Super. 88 - Commonwealth v. BOROVICHKA

2011 Pa. Super. 88 - Commonwealth v. BOROVICHKA’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Agurs · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f no statutory authorization exists for a particular sentence, that sentence is illegal and subject to correction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A challenge to the legality of a sentence ... may be entertained as long as the reviewing court has jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.