Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 SD 59 - State v. Hirning

State v. Hirning’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · State v. Chamley · State v. Asmussen · State v. Van Sickle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal, waiver of the right to counsel will not be found knowingly and intelligently made unless the trial court (1) warns the defendant of the dangers of self-representation or, (2) unless the record indicates circumstances from which this [C]ourt can [determine that] the defendant was aware of the danger and made a knowing and intelligent waiver. While in some cases there may be a record showing a defendant is aware of the pitfalls of self-representation, an admonition from the trial court is preferred as it eliminates any doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.