Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 SD 74 - State v. Fisher

State v. Fisher’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Supreme Pork, Inc. v. Master Blaster, Inc. · State v. Lemler · Burley v. Kytec Innovative Sports Equipment, Inc. · State v. Mattson · State Ex Rel. Helgerson v. Riiff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) The expert's scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) The testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) The testimony is the product of reliable principles or methods; and (d) The expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether a witness is qualified as an expert can only be determined by comparing the area in which the witness has superior knowledge, skill, experience, or education with the subject matter of the witness's testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “may bear on the weight of her testimony, but it [did] not render her testimony inadmissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.