State v. Lenkart’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited
51 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · McMann v. Richardson · Kimmelman v. Morrison · State v. Templin · Ronald R. Harries/cross, v. Ricky Bell, Warden.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'deprive[d] [him] of a fair trial and that 'there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different,”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kelson · State v. Burnside“'[slecond, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the [outcome of his easel,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“determine whether the patient suffers from a physical, mental, or emotional condition as opposed to mental or emotional problems that do not rise to the level of a condition”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bell · State v. Cegers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.