Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UT 3 - State v. Angilau

State v. Angilau’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kent v. United States · Bailey v. Bayles · Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State · State v. Mohi · Gallivan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ll statutes are presumed to be constitutional and the party challenging a statute bears the burden of proving its invalidity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law that we review for correctness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the legislature had any reasonable objective that warrants the disparity”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.