Peterson v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited
1 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brigham City v. Stuart · Ullman v. Commissioner · State v. Walker · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · Ullman v. Commissioner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The correction contemplated by rule 60(a) must be undertaken for the purpose of reflecting the actual intention of the court and parties. [It] is not intended to correct errors of a substantial nature, particularly where the claim of error is unilateral.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. T.M. v. I.A. · T.M. v. I.A.“was made in rendering the judgment or in recording the judgment as rendered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. T.M. v. I.A. · T.M. v. I.A.“[the trial court's award of prejudgment interest, and the amount thereof, present[ ] a question of law which we review for correctness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.