Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UTAPP 129 - Stewart v. Bova

Stewart v. Bova’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints · Central Florida Investments, Inc. v. Parkwest Associates · State ex rel. Z.C. · Tangren Family Trust v. Tangren Ex Rel. Tangren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[wle recognize that a court should not follow the literal language of a statute if its plain meaning works an absurd result,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “so absurd that the legislative body which authored the legislation could not have intended it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to interpret the words used by the legislature, not to correct or revise them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.