2011 UT App 138 - Osburn v. Bott’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · Gorostieta v. Parkinson · Plumb v. State · 2006 UT App 150 - Ellison v. Stam · McBride v. Utah State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Constitutional. issues, including questions regarding due process, are questions of law that we review for correctness'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Procedural due process requires, at a minimum, timely and adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard in a meaningful way.' ” Osburn v. Bott, 2011 UT App 138, ¶ 7 , 257 P.3d 1028 (quoting McBride v. Utah State Bar, 2010 UT 60, ¶ 16 , 242 P.3d 769 ). In this case, as Murphy correctly acknowledges,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.