Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UT App 163 - State v. Adams

2011 UT App 163 - State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 229 Ill. 2d 584 - People v. Naylor · State v. Knight · State v. Low · United States v. Powell · State v. Kohl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recognize[d] a presumption that the court considers only admissible evidence and disregards any inadmissible evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “judges in bench trials are presumed to be less likely than juries to be prejudiced by [inadmissible] evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the inadmissible evidence actually factored into the trial court's determination of the defendant's (guilt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.