Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UT App 231 - Harrison v. Thurston

2011 UT App 231 - Harrison v. Thurston’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Menzies v. Galetka · Community Dental Services v. Tani · Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schettler · Katz v. Pierce · 30 Utah 2d 65 - Airkem Intermountain, Inc. v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for purposes of Utah Code section 80-5-2. This situation also does not fall into the narrow cireum-stance in which the Legislature has permitted grandparent visitation rights to survive an adoption. The district court correctly concluded that Lindsay lacks standing to seek statutory grandparent visitation. II. Denial of Lindsay's Rule 60(b) Motion 126 Lindsay also argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying her rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from summary judgment on her civil conspiracy claim. See Utah R. Civ. P. 60(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “suspended from the practice of law for unrelated conduct, his law practice was essentially closed, and 500. or so case files [including Harrison's] were transferred by court order to a third-party trustee who was to return the files to [the attorney's] clients.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “require[s]l some evidence that the moving party has exercised sufficient diligence [to justify] grant[ing] him relief from the judgment entered as a result of his neglect”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.