Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UT App 251 - State v. Simons

2011 UT App 251 - State v. Simons’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arizona v. Johnson · State v. Sery · Bailey v. Bayles · State v. Lopez · State v. Hansen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “explained to [Simons] that [he] had found paraphernalia in the car and asked [Simons] if he had anything on his person [Deputy Luke] need[ed] to know about.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “did not measurably extend the length of the traffic stop or render the overall duration of the stop unreasonable,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “need not determine whether Deputy Luke's questioning of Simons was supported by reasonable suspicion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.