Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2011 UTAPP 254 - State v. Duran

State v. Duran’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Taylor v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we are not convinced that the trial court exceeded its discretion in denying [Milligan]'s motion for a new trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he introduction of [excluded] evidence can be grounds for a new trial in some instances. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the evidence against [the defendant] on the count of which he was convicted was strong”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.