2011 UT App 256 - Lyon v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Robbins · State v. Carter · Dixon v. Stewart · Sorensen v. Sorensen · 2002 UT App 189 - Neely v. Bennett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A jury is not required to believe an expert witness even when that expert's opinion is unchallenged by the opinion of an opposing expert”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A jury's latitude to weigh the credibility of witnesses is extraordinarily broad,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[when it assesses expert testimony, a jury's latitude is éven broader.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schreib v. Whitmer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.